Close Menu
    What's New

    Ookla unveils trends in AI cloud latency

    July 29, 2026

    Khalifa Fund, Cyber Security Council promote safe digital culture

    July 29, 2026

    Arab countries, regional organizations condemn attempted attacks on Saudi oil facilities

    July 28, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    The Gulf GazetteThe Gulf Gazette
    • Home
    • KSA
    • UAE
    • GCC
    • Technology
    • Lifestyle
    • Sports
    The Gulf GazetteThe Gulf Gazette
    Home»UAE»UAE court rejects Dh100,000 compensation claim in Golden Visa employment dispute
    UAE

    UAE court rejects Dh100,000 compensation claim in Golden Visa employment dispute

    Editorial TeamBy Editorial TeamJuly 28, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email


    A court in Abu Dhabi has recently rejected an employee’s claim for Dh100,000 in compensation from his employer for what he said were financial damages he suffered after the company wrongfully terminated his employment.

    The claimant said that he signed a two-year contract with the company starting July 11, 2024. In August 2025, he obtained the UAE Golden Visa, and as part of the process to get the long-term process, they had to temporarily cancel his existing work contract, residency visa and work visa permit. He claimed that he agreed with the employer to issue him a new employment contract and work permit after the Golden Visa was issued.

    However, when the employee approached his insurer to claim benefits under the UAE’s Involuntary Loss of Employment (ILOE) insurance scheme, he was informed that his employment contract had officially ended on August 11, 2025, and that no new contract had been registered. The employee alleged that his employer had previously agreed to issue a new contract after his Golden Visa was granted. Because more than one month had passed since the recorded termination date, the insurer rejected his claim under the policy rules.

    Stay up to date with the latest news. Follow KT on WhatsApp Channels.

    What the employee claimed

    In his lawsuit, the employee said that due to ending his employment contract “wrongfully”, he lost unemployment insurance benefits and missed a job opportunity in Saudi Arabia with a salary of Dh45,975. He claimed his company did not adhere to the original two-year contract and it ended his employment without a valid reason. He told the court that because of what happened, he also became jobless

    Therefore, he asked the court to order the company to pay him Dh100,000 in compensation.

    How the company responded

    The company denied any wrongdoing in the case and stated that the termination of his employment was lawful and that he was given written notice. It also stated that he completed his notice period in accordance with UAE labour laws.

    The employee, it added, had no evidence to prove any financial damages or any missed job opportunity in Saudi Arabia.

    What did the court say?

    In its final decision, the Abu Dhabi Family, Civil and Administrative Claims Court rejected the lawsuit, saying: “The employee claimed that the company harmed him by failing to issue a new contract after his Golden Visa, but he did not prove this agreement or any actual damage, so his compensation claim cannot be accepted.”

    The court rejected his claim because it found he failed to prove that the company committed a wrongful act or caused him any damage. The judge said the employee did not prove the alleged agreement or obligation on the company’s part to issue a new employment contract after he obtained the Golden Visa.

    The court also noted that, according to the employee’s own statement, the cancellation of the contract and work permit was agreed by both parties to obtain the Golden Visa. Therefore, the court found that the cancellation itself was a mutual arrangement rather than evidence of wrongdoing by the company.

    In addition, the court found that the employee did not provide sufficient evidence to support his claimed losses, including his allegation that he lost a job opportunity in Saudi Arabia, nor did he prove that the company was responsible for the loss of his unemployment insurance benefit.

    In addition to rejecting the Dh100,000 claim, the court ordered the employee to pay the court fees.

    Source: Khaleej Times

    Previous ArticleGlobal electric car growth slows in H1
    Next Article Former Hong Kong opposition leader allowed to stay in UK after deportation threat

    Related Posts

    Khalifa Fund, Cyber Security Council promote safe digital culture

    July 29, 2026

    Louvre, Guggenheim: Museums, experiences at Saadiyat Island Abu Dhabi

    July 28, 2026

    US consumer confidence in economy declines as fuel prices rise

    July 28, 2026
    Latest Posts

    Ookla unveils trends in AI cloud latency

    July 29, 2026

    Khalifa Fund, Cyber Security Council promote safe digital culture

    July 29, 2026

    Arab countries, regional organizations condemn attempted attacks on Saudi oil facilities

    July 28, 2026

    GCC foreign ministers discuss regional developments, Hormuz security

    July 28, 2026
    Don't Miss

    Ookla unveils trends in AI cloud latency

    By Editorial TeamJuly 29, 2026

    Ookla, a network performance measurement company, recently shared research which found network responsiveness for AI…

    Austria’s inflation rate up by 0.9% to 3.1% in March

    April 1, 2026

    Saudi FM, UN chief discuss regional developments in phone call

    April 1, 2026
    2026. All rights reserved.
    • KSA
    • UAE
    • GCC
    • Technology
    • Lifestyle
    • Sports
    • Contact us

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.